Just Society Technologies

What if the people who know the most were heard first?

Decisions made without the undercounted fail quietly, then expensively.

1899

W.E.B. Du Bois, Philadelphia

$3K → $63K+GDP per capita, 1960-2020World Bank
~2%Net worth held by the bottom halfFederal Reserve
3.4 → 6 yrsBlack-white life expectancy gapCDC NCHS
86%Health depts. need outside help for assessmentsNACCHO 2019
01 / The forces

They do not arrive one at a time.

18

Billion-dollar disasters a year

Up from 3 a year in the 1980s. The least buffer absorbs the most damage.

NOAA NCEI
1899
02 / The lineage

127 years old. The problem never left.

Du Bois paired household survey with participatory research. Every framework since confirmed: aggregate numbers hide the block.

The people who need governance most are the people governance counts least.
The Undercounted
03 / The counting gap

The instruments keep missing.

Four mechanisms produce the undercount. Standard methods cannot cross any of them.

Standard outreachPeer-to-peer
15of 100 reached

Standard outreach. JST planning benchmark.

Survey response collapsed: 36% to 6%Pew Research Center, 2019
Peer-driven referral reaches hidden populationsHeckathorn, Social Problems, 1997
Community health workers cut hospitalizations (RCT)Kangovi et al., JAMA Internal Medicine, 2018
Census undercount: 3.3-5.6% for Black, Hispanic and AI/AN populationsU.S. Census Bureau PES, 2020

Reach figures are JST planning benchmarks, pending field validation. How reach is measured

Nia listens. Community intelligence.
Trained, paid Community Civic Researchers reach residents traditional outreach misses.
04 / What a partner buys

Three outcomes. Every tool serves at least one.

01

State failure prevention

Resilience debt measured at the community level, tracked at the level of the state.

NiaDiraRimi
02

Workforce credentialing

Residents hired as researchers with a portable credential to state-certified CHW.

NiaCheti ladder
03

Decision-grade intelligence

Barrier-compounding analysis and governed dashboards at three depths of sight.

NiaAsaDiraHarriet
05 / How a place gets counted

Six steps. None is skipped.

Groundwork

Map the organizations and people who hold trust.

Board seated

Residents nominated. Stewardship Board adopts its charter.

Researchers trained

Hired, trained, credentialed. Paid from day one.

Venues placed

Collection where people already gather.

Collection and quality

Wave runs, responses verified, coverage measured.

Board review

Findings at the depth each institution holds.

Host

Host a collection point. No cost. Join the network

Subscribe

Governed dashboard at the depth you need.

Deploy

Locale consortia. Co-funded, capped shares.

06 / Who we serve

Eight partners. What result do you need?

NiaAsaDiraHarrietRimi

See every partner

07 / Trust

Most platforms set no limits. We set six.

The refusals
  • We will not trade community trust for institutional convenience.
  • We will not extract without building permanent capacity.
  • We will not deliver insight an organization cannot act on.
  • We never ask immigration status or criminal history.

Full charter

08 / The landscape

Each does one thing well. None holds all four.

Strategy consultancies

Analytical rigor, executive access

Hover to see the gap →

No trusted relationship with the populations the data is about.

Survey platforms

Fast, cheap distribution

Hover to see the gap →

Response rates collapse in the communities this work must reach.

Govtech

Scale, dashboards, procurement

Hover to see the gap →

Reach the already-reachable. Read the present, not history.

Participatory research

Methodological depth

Hover to see the gap →

No productized suite, no real-time delivery, no path to action.

Care coordination

Network density, payers

Hover to see the gap →

No community intelligence driving the match upstream.

Start with a conversation.

About your place, the decision in front of you and whether the tools fit.

Request a briefing
Displaying JST_Company (2).html.